Trump Warns of WWIII with Netanyahu: Israel-Lebanon Conflict, Russia Strikes Ukraine, U.S. Crypto Plan
Objective Summary:
Former President Donald Trump met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago and made a significant claim that the ongoing Middle East conflict could escalate into World War III if he does not win the 2024 presidential election. This meeting followed Netanyahu's discussions with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris in Washington, D.C.
Key Points:
1. Trump's Warning: Trump asserted that current global tensions, particularly the conflict between Israel and Hamas, could lead to a third world war if he is not elected in 2024. He criticized the current administration's handling of Middle East affairs.
2. Harris and Netanyahu: Vice President Harris, likely to be the Democratic nominee after Biden's withdrawal, had a contentious meeting with Netanyahu. In it, she expressed concerns about civilian casualties in Gaza and called for a ceasefire.
3. Netanyahu's Position: Netanyahu emphasized the importance of U.S. support for Israel and accused Iran of funding anti-Israel protests. He also criticized the LGBT community for supporting Hamas, pointing out the group's hostile stance towards LGBT rights.
4. Political Context: The discussions and statements are set against the backdrop of the upcoming 2024 U.S. presidential election, with Trump positioning himself as a candidate who would better handle international conflicts, particularly in the Middle East.
Conclusions:
Trump's statements highlight his attempt to frame the 2024 election as a pivotal moment for U.S. foreign policy and global stability, especially concerning the Middle East. The tension between Harris and Netanyahu indicates differing views on how to handle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which could potentially impact future U.S.-Israel relations. Netanyahu's remarks underline the critical role of U.S. support for Israel in the ongoing conflict.
Expanded Analysis:
The geopolitical landscape is fraught with several conflicts that could escalate into a larger war. Former President Trump's assertion that the Middle East conflict could potentially trigger World War III is bold but must be contextualized within a broader spectrum of global tensions.
1. Russia/Ukraine Conflict:
• The ongoing war in Ukraine poses a significant threat to global stability. If NATO were drawn into the conflict, it could spark a more significant, possibly global, confrontation. This conflict has already strained relationships within the European Union, with countries like Hungary and Slovakia expressing divergent views on handling the situation.
2. E.U. Internal Tensions:
• The European Union is grappling with internal divisions exacerbated by the Ukraine conflict. Countries like Hungary and Slovakia have taken stances that sometimes diverge from the broader E.U. consensus, highlighting the challenges of maintaining a unified foreign policy within the bloc.
3. Taiwan and China:
• The tension between Taiwan and China is another flashpoint. Any aggressive move by China towards Taiwan could trigger a regional conflict involving the United States and its allies, potentially escalating into a broader war. The strategic importance of Taiwan and the strong international support for its sovereignty make this a critical area of concern.
4. Middle East Dynamics:
• While Trump focuses on the Middle East, it's essential to note that the region's instability is part of a larger pattern of global unrest. The conflict between Israel and Hamas, alongside Hezbollah's involvement, certainly has the potential to draw in regional and global powers, but it is not the sole flashpoint.
Conclusion:
Former President Trump's statement underscores his perspective on the current administration's foreign policy and its implications for global security. However, the potential for World War III cannot be attributed to a single conflict. The international theatre includes several critical areas of tension, each with the potential to escalate into broader conflicts. Understanding this wider context is essential when evaluating such bold claims. It highlights the interconnected nature of global politics and the importance of comprehensive, nuanced foreign policy strategies to mitigate the risk of widespread conflict.
How One Man Can Make Such a Bold Statement:
Trump's statement can be seen as a reflection of his political strategy. By making a dramatic claim, he draws attention to his campaign and underscores his stance on national security. It's a tactic to emphasize his perceived strengths and critique his opponents. In the context of an election, such bold statements are designed to resonate with voters who prioritize strong leadership on international issues. However, the complexity of global politics means that every leader or event can only partially dictate the course of international relations.
Israel bombs targets in Lebanon.
The airstrikes came after Israel accused Hezbollah of killing 12 civilians in the Golan Heights.
Objective Summary
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) carried out airstrikes on multiple targets in southern Lebanon in retaliation for a rocket attack that killed 12 civilians in the Golan Heights, an incident Israel attributes to Hezbollah. The strikes targeted Hezbollah's weapons caches and infrastructure. The escalation follows increased tensions and exchanges of fire between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, raising concerns of an all-out war. The U.N. has called for restraint to prevent a broader regional conflict.
Key Points
1. IDF Airstrikes:
- Israel conducted airstrikes on Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon, including weapons caches and infrastructure.
- Targets were struck in areas such as Chabriha, Borj El Chmali, and Beqaa.
2. Catalyst Incident:
- The airstrikes followed a rocket attack in the Golan Heights, killing 12 civilians, mostly children, in the Druze village of Majdal Shams.
- Israel blames Hezbollah for the attack, which Hezbollah denies.
3. Hezbollah's Actions:
- Hezbollah has been firing rockets and mortar shells at Israeli targets in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.
4. Israeli Response:
- Israeli officials, including Foreign Minister Israel Katz, condemned Hezbollah and warned of the potential for an all-out war.
5. International Reactions:
- U.N. officials called for maximum restraint to avoid further escalation and a potential regional catastrophe.
Objective Solutions
1. Diplomatic Intervention:
- Immediate diplomatic efforts by international bodies such as the U.N. to mediate between Israel and Hezbollah, aiming for a ceasefire.
2. International Peacekeeping:
- Deployment of additional U.N. peacekeepers to monitor the Israel-Lebanon border and ensure compliance with ceasefire agreements.
3. Humanitarian Aid:
- Provision of humanitarian aid to affected civilians in both regions, ensuring their safety and well-being.
4. Dialogue Facilitation:
- Facilitating dialogue between Israeli and Lebanese authorities to address underlying issues and prevent further escalations.
5. Sanctions and Incentives:
- Implement targeted sanctions against entities perpetuating violence alongside incentives for those engaging in peace talks.
Robust Conclusion
The recent Israeli airstrikes on Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon mark a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict, driven by a deadly rocket attack in the Golan Heights. With tensions running high and the potential for all-out war, the international community must step in with diplomatic and humanitarian interventions. Immediate efforts to mediate a ceasefire, combined with long-term strategies to address the root causes of the conflict, are essential to prevent a broader regional catastrophe. Peace and stability can be restored in the region through coordinated and sustained efforts.
Strikes on foreign mercs, hunt for HIMARS, and electronic warfare systems: Past week in the Ukraine conflict (VIDEOS)
Russia continues its campaign to destroy high-value assets and Kyiv's forces, including foreign 'instructors.'
Objective Summary
Over the past week in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Russian military has reported significant gains and inflicted substantial casualties on Ukrainian forces and foreign mercenaries. Key developments include the capture of several villages and continued advances in strategic areas. Additionally, Russia conducted multiple strikes on high-value targets, including HIMARS launchers and logistics hubs, while disrupting Ukrainian electronic warfare capabilities.
Key Points
1. Territorial Gains:
- Russia captured villages such as Rozovka, Peschanoye Nizhneye, Ivano-Daryevka, and Lozovatovskoye.
- Advancements were made near the strategic towns of Avdeevka and Ocheretino.
2. Casualties:
- Russia claimed to have killed up to 90 foreign mercenaries in strikes on buildings housing Western instructors and mercenaries in Dergachi and Kharkiv.
- Strikes on Ukrainian military logistics killed up to 240 service members and destroyed significant military hardware.
3. High-Value Target Strikes:
- Multiple HIMARS launchers, used by Ukraine for strategic strikes, were targeted and destroyed.
- Other military equipment, including Soviet-era rocket launchers and tanks, were also hit.
4. Electronic Warfare Disruption:
- Russia targeted and destroyed several Ukrainian electronic warfare systems, including US-supplied artillery radars and homegrown jammers.
5. Logistics Disruption:
- Strikes on railway hubs, bridges, and military trains aimed to disrupt Ukrainian logistics and reinforcements.
Objective Solutions
1. Diplomatic Efforts:
- Renewed diplomatic negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, facilitated by neutral third parties, to establish ceasefires and peace talks.
2. International Mediation:
- Involvement of international organizations like the U.N. to mediate and monitor agreements or ceasefires.
3. Humanitarian Aid:
- Increased humanitarian aid and support for civilians affected by the conflict, ensuring safe evacuation and aid delivery corridors.
4. Economic Sanctions and Incentives:
- Continued and strategically applied economic sanctions on aggressors, paired with incentives for compliance with international laws and agreements.
5. Enhanced Cybersecurity:
- Improved cybersecurity measures to protect against electronic warfare and maintain communication integrity.
Robust Conclusion
The past week's developments in the Russia-Ukraine conflict underscore the intensity and complexity of the ongoing hostilities. With significant territorial gains and high-value target strikes, the conflict remains dynamic and destructive. Objective solutions require a multifaceted approach involving diplomatic, humanitarian, and strategic measures to mitigate further escalation and work toward a sustainable resolution. International cooperation and mediation are essential to address the underlying issues and promote a peaceful outcome.
Ukrainians are playing games on negotiations – Lavrov.
The Russian Foreign Minister has said he "does not listen" to Kyiv's proposals as they lack credibility.
Objective Summary
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has dismissed Ukrainian negotiation proposals, accusing Kyiv of lacking credibility and playing games. Lavrov's remarks underscore ongoing skepticism and distrust between Russia and Ukraine amid the conflict, indicating a stalemate in diplomatic efforts.
Key Points
1. Lavrov's Dismissal:
- Lavrov stated that he disregards Ukrainian negotiation proposals, questioning their sincerity and credibility.
2. Lack of Trust:
- Lavrov's comments reflect deep-seated distrust and skepticism towards Kyiv's intentions in the negotiation process.
3. Diplomatic Stalemate:
- The dismissive stance from Russia suggests that diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict remain at an impasse.
4. Context of Conflict:
- This exchange occurs within the broader context of ongoing hostilities and military actions between Russia and Ukraine.
Objective Solutions
1. Independent Mediation:
- Involvement of neutral international mediators to facilitate genuine and unbiased negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.
2. Confidence-Building Measures:
- Implement confidence-building measures, such as prisoner exchanges or ceasefires, to foster trust between the parties.
3. Verification Mechanisms:
- Establishment of verification mechanisms to ensure that commitments made during negotiations are honored by both sides.
4. Inclusive Dialogue:
- Ensuring that all relevant stakeholders, including local leaders and civil society groups, are included in the negotiation process to enhance its legitimacy.
5. International Pressure:
- Coordinated international pressure on both sides to engage in meaningful negotiations, potentially through diplomatic or economic incentives.
Robust Conclusion
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's dismissal of Ukrainian proposals highlights the significant challenges facing diplomatic efforts in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The evident distrust and perceived lack of credibility hinder meaningful dialogue and negotiation. For progress to be made, it is essential to involve neutral mediators, implement confidence-building measures, and establish robust verification mechanisms. The diplomatic stalemate can be overcome only through sustained and genuine efforts, paving the way for a peaceful resolution.
Türkiye could 'enter' Israel – Erdogan.
The Turkish president has issued a rare threat to invade Israel over the conflict in the Gaza Strip.
Objective Summary
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has issued a rare and robust threat to invade Israel over the ongoing conflict in Gaza potentially. Speaking at a rally, Erdogan compared a potential intervention in Israel to Turkey's past military actions in Karabakh and Libya. This statement comes amid heightened tensions between Israel and Hezbollah, exacerbated by recent violent incidents, including a deadly rocket attack in the Golan Heights.
Key Points
1. Erdogan's Threat:
- Erdogan suggested that Turkey might intervene in Israel, similar to its actions in Karabakh and Libya.
- He emphasized the need for Turkey to be strong to protect Palestine from Israeli strikes.
2. Historical Context:
- Turkey has been involved in recent conflicts in Karabakh and Libya, supporting Azerbaijan and participating in the Libyan civil war.
3. Support for Palestinians:
- Erdogan has consistently positioned himself as a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause.
4. Heightened Tensions:
- The threat comes amid escalating tensions between Israel and Hezbollah, with recent violence including a rocket attack that killed 12 in the Golan Heights.
5. Hezbollah's Denial:
- Hezbollah denied involvement in the rocket attack, attributing it to a malfunctioned Israeli Iron Dome interceptor missile.
Objective Solutions
1. Diplomatic Engagement:
- Initiate diplomatic discussions involving Turkey, Israel, and other regional stakeholders to de-escalate tensions and prevent potential conflict.
2. International Mediation:
- Engage international organizations like the U.N. to mediate between conflicting parties and broker a ceasefire or peace talks.
3. Regional Cooperation:
- Promote regional cooperation frameworks that include Turkey, Israel, Lebanon, and Palestine to address underlying issues and foster stability.
4. Conflict Prevention Measures:
- Implement conflict prevention measures such as establishing no-fly zones, monitoring borders, and deploying peacekeeping forces in sensitive areas.
5. Humanitarian Initiatives:
- Launch humanitarian initiatives to support affected civilians and ensure their safety while addressing the root causes of the conflict through development aid.
Robust Conclusion
President Erdogan's recent threat to potentially invade Israel marks a significant escalation in rhetoric amid the ongoing Gaza conflict. The already high tensions between Israel and Hezbollah further complicate the situation, raising the risk of broader regional conflict. Immediate diplomatic and international mediation efforts are crucial to avert such an outcome. Engaging all relevant parties in dialogue and conflict prevention measures, coupled with solid humanitarian initiatives, can help de-escalate tensions and pave the way for a more stable and peaceful region.
Moscow reacts to Israel-Hezbollah escalation.
Terrorist attacks are unacceptable no matter who carries them out, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.
Objective Summary
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov condemned terrorism by any entity in response to the recent escalation on the Israeli-Lebanese border. This comes after Israel accused Hezbollah of a rocket attack that killed 12 civilians in the Golan Heights, and Hezbollah denied involvement. Lavrov reiterated Russia's condemnation of both the October 7 Hamas attack on Israeli civilians and Israel's retaliatory actions, which he deemed as collective punishment and a violation of international humanitarian law.
Key Points
1. Lavrov's Condemnation:
- Lavrov condemned all terrorist actions by any entity, emphasizing Russia's consistent stance against terrorism.
- He criticized both the Hamas attack on Israeli civilians and Israel's retaliatory actions.
2. Rocket Attack and Denial:
- Israel accused Hezbollah of launching a rocket that killed 12 civilians in the Golan Heights.
- Hezbollah denied involvement in the attack.
3. Israeli Retaliation:
- In response to the attack, Israel conducted strikes on Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon.
- Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz warned of a potential all-out war with Hezbollah.
4. Background of Golan Heights:
- The Golan Heights, strategically significant, was seized by Israel from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War and later annexed, a move not widely recognized internationally.
5. Regional Tensions:
- Tensions between Israel and Hezbollah have been high since the Hamas attack, raising concerns of a wider regional conflict.
- A US official described the situation as nearing an "all-out war" and a "nightmare scenario" feared by the White House.
Objective Solutions
1. International Mediation:
- Engage neutral international mediators to facilitate dialogue between Israel and Hezbollah to prevent further escalation.
2. Ceasefire Agreements:
- Broker immediate ceasefire agreements to halt the violence and create space for diplomatic negotiations.
3. Humanitarian Intervention:
- Launch humanitarian missions to assist affected civilians, ensuring access to medical aid and essential supplies.
4. Regional Peace Initiatives:
- Promote comprehensive peace initiatives involving key regional players to address underlying issues and foster long-term stability.
5. Strengthening UN Peacekeeping:
- Enhance the mandate and presence of U.N. peacekeeping forces in the region to monitor and enforce ceasefire agreements and prevent further hostilities.
Robust Conclusion
The recent escalation between Israel and Hezbollah has drawn international condemnation and heightened fears of a wider regional conflict. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's condemnation of all forms of terrorism, alongside his criticism of Israel's retaliatory actions, highlights the complexities of the situation. To prevent further violence and potential all-out war, immediate and coordinated international efforts are essential. Engaging in diplomatic mediation, securing ceasefires, providing humanitarian aid, and promoting long-term peace initiatives are crucial steps toward de-escalating tensions and achieving lasting peace in the region.
China warns Philippines of 'arms race' over U.S. missiles.
Beijing said introducing intermediate-range weapons would fuel "tension and confrontation" in the region.
Objective Summary
China has warned the Philippines against hosting U.S. intermediate-range missile systems, suggesting it could lead to regional tension and an arms race. This warning was issued by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi during a meeting with his Philippine counterpart, Enrique Manalo, at the ASEAN summit in Laos. The Philippines' recent activities in the disputed South China Sea, including the deployment of U.S. missile systems and actions around the BRP Sierra Madre outpost, have exacerbated tensions. Despite a provisional agreement on resupply missions to the disputed vessel, both countries continue to experience strained relations.
Key Points
1. China's Warning:
- Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi cautioned that the introduction of U.S. intermediate-range missile systems in the Philippines could trigger regional tension and an arms race.
- Wang stated that such actions are against the interests of the Filipino people.
2. U.S. Missile Systems in the Philippines:
- Washington deployed Typhon launchers capable of firing Standard SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles to the Philippines in April.
- According to a recent announcement by Manila, these systems are scheduled to be withdrawn in the coming months.
3. South China Sea Disputes:
- The South China Sea is a major area of contention with overlapping territorial claims by multiple countries.
- The Philippines has increased its activities around the BRP Sierra Madre, an outpost in the Second Thomas Shoal, leading to repeated confrontations with China.
4. Provisional Agreement on Resupply Missions:
- China and the Philippines recently reached a provisional agreement to manage resupply missions to the BRP Sierra Madre.
- China allowed a resupply run, stating it carried only humanitarian necessities, but the Philippines accused China of mischaracterizing the deal.
Objective Solutions
1. Diplomatic Engagement:
- Enhance diplomatic dialogue between China, the Philippines, and the U.S. to address concerns and find common ground.
- ASEAN could facilitate multi-party talks to mediate and de-escalate tensions.
2. Arms Control Agreements:
- Consider regional arms control agreements to prevent an arms race and promote transparency regarding military deployments.
3. Confidence-Building Measures:
- Implement confidence-building measures such as joint exercises, hotlines, and regular communication to reduce the risk of miscalculations.
4. Clarifying Agreements:
- Clearly define and communicate agreements related to disputed territories and military activities to avoid misunderstandings.
5. International Mediation:
- Involve international bodies such as the U.N. to mediate disputes and ensure compliance with international laws and agreements.
Robust Conclusion
China's warning to the Philippines about hosting U.S. missile systems underscores the fragile security environment in the region. The deployment of these systems risks escalating tensions and potentially triggering an arms race. Diplomatic engagement and regional cooperation are crucial to de-escalate the situation and prevent further deterioration of relations. The involved parties can work towards regional stability and peace by fostering dialogue, implementing arms control measures, and enhancing transparency. All stakeholders must prioritize peaceful resolution of disputes and cooperative security arrangements to safeguard regional interests and maintain international peace.
U.S. will become 'global crypto capital' – Trump
The former president has pledged to create a Bitcoin "strategic reserve" if he wins in November.
Objective Summary
If re-elected, former U.S. President Donald Trump has pledged to make the United States the global leader in cryptocurrency. Speaking at a Bitcoin Conference in Nashville, Trump announced plans to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve and ensure the U.S. government retains its Bitcoin holdings. He contrasted his pro-crypto stance with the current administration's perceived efforts to restrict the industry.
Key Points
1. Trump's Crypto Vision:
- Trump aims to make the U.S. the "crypto capital of the planet" and the leading bitcoin superpower.
- He proposed creating a strategic bitcoin reserve and retaining all government-held bitcoins.
2. Regulation and Industry Support:
- Trump promised that industry supporters would write pro-crypto regulations.
- He criticized the current administration's approach to crypto as repressive and un-American.
3. Historical Context and U-Turn:
- Trump previously criticized Bitcoin but has shifted his stance, now accepting crypto donations for his campaign.
- He highlighted the potential for Bitcoin to increase in value and market capitalization significantly.
4. Government Bitcoin Holdings:
- The U.S. government currently holds around 212,000 bitcoins, worth approximately $15 billion.
- Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis proposed a bill to expand the federal bitcoin reserve to 1 million bitcoins over five years.
5. Market Predictions:
- Michael Saylor predicted Bitcoin could reach $49 million per token by 2045, with a market capitalization of nearly $100 trillion.
Objective Solutions
1. Balanced Regulation:
- Implement balanced regulations that support innovation in the crypto industry while protecting investors and maintaining financial stability.
2. Public-Private Collaboration:
- Foster collaboration between the government and private sector to develop a robust framework for cryptocurrency operations.
3. Financial Education:
- Promote financial literacy programs to educate the public about the benefits and risks associated with cryptocurrencies.
4. Strategic Investments:
- Assess the potential benefits and risks of a national bitcoin reserve and make informed decisions based on comprehensive analysis.
Objective Opinion
A cashless society, particularly one heavily reliant on cryptocurrencies, can pose significant risks, including potential government overreach and loss of financial privacy. While Trump's vision for making the U.S. a crypto leader has merits, such as fostering innovation and potentially boosting the economy, it also carries risks that need careful consideration.
Objective Conclusions
1. Potential Benefits:
- Establishing the U.S. as a crypto hub could attract investments, create jobs, and position the country at the forefront of financial innovation.
- A strategic bitcoin reserve might be a valuable financial asset if managed correctly.
2. Risks and Challenges:
- Overreliance on cryptocurrencies could lead to increased volatility and economic instability.
- There are concerns about privacy, security, and potential misuse of digital currencies.
- Government control over digital currencies could lead to excessive surveillance and loss of individual financial autonomy.
3. Balanced Approach:
- It is crucial to balance promoting innovation and ensuring regulatory oversight to prevent abuse and protect citizens' rights.
- Engaging in open dialogues with stakeholders and conducting thorough risk assessments can help mitigate potential downsides.
In summary, while Trump's vision for a crypto-driven economy offers exciting opportunities, it is essential to approach it with caution and a well-thought-out regulatory framework to safeguard against potential pitfalls.
Trump's Warnings and Harris's Concerns
Jared discussed the recent bold statements by former President Donald Trump and Vice President Harris during their meeting with The Israeli Prime Minister. Trump warned of a potential escalation into World War III if he is not re-elected in 2024, citing the ongoing Middle East conflict, particularly the Israel-Hamas conflict, as a significant concern. Harris, on the other hand, expressed her concerns about civilian casualties in Gaza and called for an immediate ceasefire. The discussion also touched on Russia's strikes in Ukraine and the US's crypto plan.
Link:
Trump's Statements and Geopolitical Complexities - Time 2:55
Israel-Hezbollah Tensions and Diplomatic Interventions- Time 8:18
Northeastern Israel Attack and Hezbollah Responsibilities- Time 11:55
Russian Gains and Diplomatic Impasse in Ukraine- Time 17:03
Israel-Hezbollah Tensions and Diplomatic Efforts- Time 22:15
China's Warning on US Missile Systems- Time 27:23
Cryptocurrency Leadership and Regulatory Balance - Time 30:23
Jared's Presentation on Mali, Ukraine, and Truth - Time 35:17
In Christ, love Jared W. Campbell
#jesus #faith #facts #truth #trending #viral #viralvideo #vlogger #russiaukrainewar #russia #russiaukraine #russian #russiaukraineconflict #russiavsukraine #russianarmy #ukraine #ukrainewar #ukrainenews #ukrainerussiawar #ukrainian #nato #news #newstoday #newsupdate #newstatus #worldnews #world #worldwide #worldwar3 #war #wakeup #preparation #preparedness #prepare #prepper #christian #spiritual #love #peace #wisdom #nowar #getready #warzone #viralvideos #fighting #military #firefighters #walkthrough #watch #political #politicalnews #politics #podcast #endtimes #apocalypse #geopolitics #donaldtrump #trump #trumpnews #election #election2024 #electionnews #biden #joebiden #kurdistan #china #turkey #armenia #preparation #china #chinanews #taiwan #philippines
Comments